↓ Skip to main content

Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 266)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
73 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
Title
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Published in
Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
DOI 10.3310/hsdr04160
Authors

Rosalind Raine, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Barratt, Gywn Bevan, Nick Black, Ruth Boaden, Peter Bower, Marion Campbell, Jean-Louis Denis, Kelly Devers, Mary Dixon-Woods, Lesley Fallowfield, Julien Forder, Robbie Foy, Nick Freemantle, Naomi J Fulop, Elizabeth Gibbons, Clare Gillies, Lucy Goulding, Richard Grieve, Jeremy Grimshaw, Emma Howarth, Richard J Lilford, Ruth McDonald, Graham Moore, Laurence Moore, Robin Newhouse, Alicia O’Cathain, Zeynep Or, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Stephanie Prady, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Jasjeet Sekhon, Simon Turner, Samuel I Watson, Merrick Zwarenstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
Brazil 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 223 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 43 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 16 7%
Other 51 22%
Unknown 41 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 29 12%
Social Sciences 26 11%
Psychology 15 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 4%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 59 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#400,056
of 15,798,970 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Delivery Research
#16
of 266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,150
of 268,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Delivery Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,798,970 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them