↓ Skip to main content

Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 207)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
77 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
Title
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Published in
Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
DOI 10.3310/hsdr04160
Authors

NIHR Journals Library , Rosalind Raine , Ray Fitzpatrick , Helen Barratt , Gywn Bevan , Nick Black , Ruth Boaden , Peter Bower , Marion Campbell , Jean-Louis Denis , Kelly Devers , Mary Dixon-Woods , Lesley Fallowfield , Julien Forder , Robbie Foy , Nick Freemantle , Naomi J Fulop , Elizabeth Gibbons , Clare Gillies , Lucy Goulding , Richard Grieve , Jeremy Grimshaw , Emma Howarth , Richard J Lilford , Ruth McDonald , Graham Moore , Laurence Moore , Robin Newhouse , Alicia O’Cathain , Zeynep Or , Chrysanthi Papoutsi , Stephanie Prady , Jo Rycroft-Malone , Jasjeet Sekhon , Simon Turner , Samuel I Watson , Merrick Zwarenstein, Rosalind Raine, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Barratt, Gywn Bevan, Nick Black, Ruth Boaden, Peter Bower, Marion Campbell, Jean-Louis Denis, Kelly Devers, Mary Dixon-Woods, Lesley Fallowfield, Julien Forder, Robbie Foy, Nick Freemantle, Naomi J Fulop, Elizabeth Gibbons, Clare Gillies, Lucy Goulding, Richard Grieve, Jeremy Grimshaw, Emma Howarth, Richard J Lilford, Ruth McDonald, Graham Moore, Laurence Moore, Robin Newhouse, Alicia O’Cathain, Zeynep Or, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Stephanie Prady, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Jasjeet Sekhon, Simon Turner, Samuel I Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 128 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Unspecified 17 12%
Other 13 9%
Other 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 33%
Unspecified 28 20%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 10%
Psychology 12 9%
Other 25 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#282,025
of 13,136,707 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Delivery Research
#14
of 207 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,285
of 265,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Delivery Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,136,707 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,385 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them