↓ Skip to main content

Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 181)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
78 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
Title
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Published in
Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
DOI 10.3310/hsdr04160
Authors

NIHR Journals Library , Rosalind Raine , Ray Fitzpatrick , Helen Barratt , Gywn Bevan , Nick Black , Ruth Boaden , Peter Bower , Marion Campbell , Jean-Louis Denis , Kelly Devers , Mary Dixon-Woods , Lesley Fallowfield , Julien Forder , Robbie Foy , Nick Freemantle , Naomi J Fulop , Elizabeth Gibbons , Clare Gillies , Lucy Goulding , Richard Grieve , Jeremy Grimshaw , Emma Howarth , Richard J Lilford , Ruth McDonald , Graham Moore , Laurence Moore , Robin Newhouse , Alicia O’Cathain , Zeynep Or , Chrysanthi Papoutsi , Stephanie Prady , Jo Rycroft-Malone , Jasjeet Sekhon , Simon Turner , Samuel I Watson , Merrick Zwarenstein, Rosalind Raine, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Barratt, Gywn Bevan, Nick Black, Ruth Boaden, Peter Bower, Marion Campbell, Jean-Louis Denis, Kelly Devers, Mary Dixon-Woods, Lesley Fallowfield, Julien Forder, Robbie Foy, Nick Freemantle, Naomi J Fulop, Elizabeth Gibbons, Clare Gillies, Lucy Goulding, Richard Grieve, Jeremy Grimshaw, Emma Howarth, Richard J Lilford, Ruth McDonald, Graham Moore, Laurence Moore, Robin Newhouse, Alicia O’Cathain, Zeynep Or, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Stephanie Prady, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Jasjeet Sekhon, Simon Turner, Samuel I Watson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 5%
Brazil 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 111 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Student > Master 15 12%
Other 14 11%
Unspecified 12 10%
Other 39 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 32%
Unspecified 21 17%
Social Sciences 14 11%
Psychology 13 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Other 25 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#241,644
of 12,369,450 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Delivery Research
#11
of 181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,008
of 270,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Delivery Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,369,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them