↓ Skip to main content

Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health

Overview of attention for article published in Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 225)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
76 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health
Published in
Health Services and Delivery Research, May 2016
DOI 10.3310/hsdr04160
Authors

Rosalind Raine, Ray Fitzpatrick, Helen Barratt, Gywn Bevan, Nick Black, Ruth Boaden, Peter Bower, Marion Campbell, Jean-Louis Denis, Kelly Devers, Mary Dixon-Woods, Lesley Fallowfield, Julien Forder, Robbie Foy, Nick Freemantle, Naomi J Fulop, Elizabeth Gibbons, Clare Gillies, Lucy Goulding, Richard Grieve, Jeremy Grimshaw, Emma Howarth, Richard J Lilford, Ruth McDonald, Graham Moore, Laurence Moore, Robin Newhouse, Alicia O’Cathain, Zeynep Or, Chrysanthi Papoutsi, Stephanie Prady, Jo Rycroft-Malone, Jasjeet Sekhon, Simon Turner, Samuel I Watson, Merrick Zwarenstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 4%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 145 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 21%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 14%
Unspecified 21 13%
Other 14 9%
Other 43 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 32%
Unspecified 35 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Social Sciences 15 10%
Psychology 12 8%
Other 28 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2017.
All research outputs
#303,670
of 13,600,257 outputs
Outputs from Health Services and Delivery Research
#15
of 225 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,399
of 263,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Services and Delivery Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,600,257 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them