You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PRECISE pregnancy cohort: challenges and strategies in setting up a biorepository in sub-Saharan Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12978-020-0874-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Craik, Donna Russell, Rachel M. Tribe, Lucilla Poston, Geoffrey Omuse, Patricia Okiro, David Chege, Mathurin Diatta, Abdul Karim Sesay, Inocencia Cuamba, Carla Carrilho, Esperança Sevene, Meriel Flint-O’Kane, Peter von Dadelszen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 91 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 35 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 18% |
| Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2022.
All research outputs
#4,285,424
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#505
of 1,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,000
of 379,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#15
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.