↓ Skip to main content

Rapid reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 using a synthetic genomics platform

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
702 Mendeley
Title
Rapid reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 using a synthetic genomics platform
Published in
Nature, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41586-020-2294-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tran Thi Nhu Thao, Fabien Labroussaa, Nadine Ebert, Philip V’kovski, Hanspeter Stalder, Jasmine Portmann, Jenna Kelly, Silvio Steiner, Melle Holwerda, Annika Kratzel, Mitra Gultom, Kimberly Schmied, Laura Laloli, Linda Hüsser, Manon Wider, Stephanie Pfaender, Dagny Hirt, Valentina Cippà, Silvia Crespo-Pomar, Simon Schröder, Doreen Muth, Daniela Niemeyer, Victor M. Corman, Marcel A. Müller, Christian Drosten, Ronald Dijkman, Joerg Jores, Volker Thiel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,971 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 702 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 702 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 127 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 95 14%
Student > Bachelor 66 9%
Student > Master 60 9%
Other 35 5%
Other 117 17%
Unknown 202 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 153 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 65 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 14 2%
Other 94 13%
Unknown 223 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1423. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#8,327
of 24,896,578 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#873
of 96,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#434
of 385,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#63
of 940 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,896,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 940 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.