↓ Skip to main content

Epidemiología del siglo XXI y ciberespacio: repensar la teoría del poder y la determinación social de la salud

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epidemiología del siglo XXI y ciberespacio: repensar la teoría del poder y la determinación social de la salud
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, December 2015
DOI 10.1590/1980-5497201500040025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaime Breilh

Abstract

The study of epidemiologic processes as a form of socially determined movement requires a renewed understanding of the social order, and thus, an updated understanding of the social relations that move society. Recently, the dominance of big corporations on cyberspace has become visible as a new historical process that conditions the social order and extends the technological subordination of daily life, therefore expanding community massive submission to standard conducts. The new digital technological revolution, about which some frightening prognoses are made for the next decades, could easily imply the advent of an era of radical subsumption of life processes. This will negatively affect not only our general way of living, thinking and planning, but also our deepest daily intimacy. This movement implies radical effects on health which we call cybernetic determination and subsumption. This novel process raises new questions on public health and prevention; but also requires a new reading of reality, a rethinking of human life and health, of its social determination, which implies the need for new new categories and analysis and renewed challenges for critical epidemiology.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 15%
Social Sciences 8 14%
Psychology 5 8%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2020.
All research outputs
#7,466,018
of 22,958,253 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#69
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,830
of 388,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,958,253 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.