↓ Skip to main content

The re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Harmful algal blooms and hypoxia

Overview of attention for article published in Harmful Algae, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
383 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
631 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Harmful algal blooms and hypoxia
Published in
Harmful Algae, May 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.hal.2016.04.010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan B. Watson, Carol Miller, George Arhonditsis, Gregory L. Boyer, Wayne Carmichael, Murray N. Charlton, Remegio Confesor, David C. Depew, Tomas O. Höök, Stuart A. Ludsin, Gerald Matisoff, Shawn P. McElmurry, Michael W. Murray, R. Peter Richards, Yerubandi R. Rao, Morgan M. Steffen, Steven W. Wilhelm

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 631 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Unknown 629 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 115 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 101 16%
Student > Bachelor 89 14%
Researcher 72 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 25 4%
Other 62 10%
Unknown 167 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 174 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 15%
Engineering 53 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 31 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 3%
Other 59 9%
Unknown 204 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,840,243
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Harmful Algae
#65
of 1,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,861
of 353,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Harmful Algae
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.