↓ Skip to main content

Biogeochemistry: Unexpected uptake

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Geoscience, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Biogeochemistry: Unexpected uptake
Published in
Nature Geoscience, June 2012
DOI 10.1038/ngeo1514
Authors

Jayne Belnap

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 36 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 12%
Other 4 10%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 29%
Environmental Science 11 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2012.
All research outputs
#3,159,741
of 11,465,125 outputs
Outputs from Nature Geoscience
#1,761
of 2,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,141
of 107,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Geoscience
#37
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,465,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.