↓ Skip to main content

Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions for pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2009
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006263.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda K Martin, Anna Liza Agero, Victoria Werth, Elmer Villanueva, Janet Segall, Dedee F Murrell

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 18 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Unspecified 13 11%
Other 37 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 57%
Unspecified 22 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 8%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Other 11 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,878,054
of 13,122,094 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,956
of 10,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,062
of 265,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#127
of 184 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,122,094 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 184 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.