You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hossein Ghaeminia, Marloes EL Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, John Perry, Marcia Tummers, Theo JM Hoppenreijs, Wil JM Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Canada | 3 | 7% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Greece | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 26% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 404 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 403 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 61 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 7% |
| Researcher | 26 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 4% |
| Other | 61 | 15% |
| Unknown | 167 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 168 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 3% |
| Psychology | 6 | 1% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Unknown | 176 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2023.
All research outputs
#458,474
of 24,520,187 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#830
of 12,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,725
of 384,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#20
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,520,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.