↓ Skip to main content

Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003879.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hossein Ghaeminia, Marloes EL Nienhuijs, Verena Toedtling, John Perry, Marcia Tummers, Theo JM Hoppenreijs, Wil JM Van der Sanden, Theodorus G Mettes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Researcher 11 11%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 18 18%
Unknown 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 50%
Social Sciences 6 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 27 28%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2020.
All research outputs
#555,117
of 16,547,829 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,404
of 11,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,418
of 279,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,547,829 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,527 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.