↓ Skip to main content

Eliciting human intelligence: police source handlers’ perceptions and experiences of rapport during covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 526)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
47 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Eliciting human intelligence: police source handlers’ perceptions and experiences of rapport during covert human intelligence sources (CHIS) interactions
Published in
Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, May 2020
DOI 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jordan Nunan, Ian Stanier, Rebecca Milne, Andrea Shawyer, Dave Walsh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 47 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 24 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 7 16%
Psychology 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Linguistics 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 28 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,325,258
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
#32
of 526 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,693
of 415,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychiatry, Psychology and Law
#4
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 526 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.