↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-fluorodeoxy- glucose positron emission tomography fusion with pathological staging in rectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Surgery, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging-fluorodeoxy- glucose positron emission tomography fusion with pathological staging in rectal cancer
Published in
British Journal of Surgery, December 2009
DOI 10.1002/bjs.6866
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. H. Kam, D. C. Wong, S. Siu, A. R. L. Stevenson, J. Lai, G. E. Phillips

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 5%
Unknown 19 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 5 25%
Researcher 4 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 20%
Student > Postgraduate 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 15%
Other 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 110%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2013.
All research outputs
#3,549,463
of 12,350,075 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#1,166
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,560
of 274,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#25
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,350,075 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,790 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.