You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging–fluorodeoxy‐ glucose positron emission tomography fusion with pathological staging in rectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Surgery, December 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1002/bjs.6866 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M. H. Kam, D. C. Wong, S. Siu, A. R. L. Stevenson, J. Lai, G. E. Phillips |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 67% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Surgery
#2,556
of 5,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,517
of 164,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Surgery
#11
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.