↓ Skip to main content

Understanding the Analytics of Twitter in Cardiovascular Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Case Reports, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Understanding the Analytics of Twitter in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published in
JACC: Case Reports, May 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.03.008
Authors

David L. Fischman, Mamas A. Mamas, Mirvat Alasnag, Purvi Parwani, Michael P. Savage, Tejas Desai

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,040,938
of 15,729,106 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#67
of 379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,890
of 281,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#7
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,729,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.