| Title |
Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-020-01597-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher I. Jarvis, Kevin Van Zandvoort, Amy Gimma, Kiesha Prem, Petra Klepac, G. James Rubin, W. John Edmunds |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 184 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 44 | 24% |
| Japan | 11 | 6% |
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 2% |
| Norway | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Greece | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 114 | 62% |
| Scientists | 48 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 766 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 766 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 106 | 14% |
| Researcher | 99 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 95 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 9% |
| Other | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 141 | 18% |
| Unknown | 223 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 141 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 56 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 44 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 31 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 4% |
| Other | 203 | 27% |
| Unknown | 260 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2023.
All research outputs
#192,950
of 25,708,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#169
of 4,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,699
of 416,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#2
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,708,267 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.