↓ Skip to main content

Weather in the Anthropocene: Extreme event attribution and a modelled nature–culture divide

Overview of attention for article published in Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
38 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Weather in the Anthropocene: Extreme event attribution and a modelled nature–culture divide
Published in
Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, June 2020
DOI 10.1111/tran.12390
Authors

Shannon Osaka, Rob Bellamy

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#842,761
of 15,412,593 outputs
Outputs from Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
#57
of 670 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,565
of 276,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,412,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 670 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,901 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.