↓ Skip to main content

Child welfare assessments and the regulation of access to publicly funded fertility treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Child welfare assessments and the regulation of access to publicly funded fertility treatment
Published in
Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.01.003
Pubmed ID
URN
urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-164932
Authors

Judith Lind

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2020.
All research outputs
#396,531
of 15,383,358 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
#3
of 67 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,649
of 275,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,383,358 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 67 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them