| Title |
Clinical course and outcome of 107 patients infected with the novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, discharged from two hospitals in Wuhan, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-02895-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawei Wang, Yimei Yin, Chang Hu, Xing Liu, Xingguo Zhang, Shuliang Zhou, Mingzhi Jian, Haibo Xu, John Prowle, Bo Hu, Yirong Li, Zhiyong Peng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 10% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 644 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 644 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 82 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 70 | 11% |
| Researcher | 58 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 31 | 5% |
| Other | 123 | 19% |
| Unknown | 246 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 169 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 73 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 2% |
| Other | 73 | 11% |
| Unknown | 275 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,126,547
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,958
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,245
of 409,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#136
of 201 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 201 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.