↓ Skip to main content

Screening strategies for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
23 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening strategies for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013212.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Solange Durao, Ingrid Toews, Charlotte M Bavuma, Ameer Hohlfeld, Edris Nury, Joerg J Meerpohl, Tamara Kredo

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 17%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 15 10%
Other 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 16%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Psychology 7 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 42 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,784,960
of 17,968,541 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,261
of 11,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,196
of 286,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,968,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,910 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.