↓ Skip to main content

Screening strategies for hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
488 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Screening strategies for hypertension
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd013212.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bey-Marrié Schmidt, Solange Durao, Ingrid Toews, Charlotte M Bavuma, Ameer Hohlfeld, Edris Nury, Joerg J Meerpohl, Tamara Kredo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 488 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 488 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 11%
Student > Bachelor 40 8%
Researcher 35 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 5%
Other 23 5%
Other 91 19%
Unknown 220 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 98 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 64 13%
Social Sciences 12 2%
Psychology 11 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 2%
Other 56 11%
Unknown 237 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,426,644
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,015
of 13,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,305
of 416,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#54
of 185 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,136 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 185 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.