You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Fasciíte necrosante: revisão com enfoque nos aspectos dermatológicos
Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia, April 2004
Izelda Maria Carvalho Costa, Andrea Leão Santos Veiga Cabral, Simone Saraiva de Pontes, Janaina Figueiredo de Amorim
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||3||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||7||24%|
|Student > Postgraduate||2||7%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||11||38%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||5||17%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||1||3%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,573,233 outputs
Outputs from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
of 932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 58,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais Brasileiros de Dermatologia
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.