↓ Skip to main content

Fake News Is Real: The Significance and Sources of Disbelief in Mainstream Media in Trump’s America

Overview of attention for article published in Sociological Forum, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 531)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fake News Is Real: The Significance and Sources of Disbelief in Mainstream Media in Trump’s America
Published in
Sociological Forum, May 2020
DOI 10.1111/socf.12603
Authors

Taeku Lee, Christian Hosam

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#538,964
of 15,077,982 outputs
Outputs from Sociological Forum
#19
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,968
of 178,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociological Forum
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,077,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them