↓ Skip to main content

Acute effects of a single, oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) administration in healthy volunteers.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 3,725)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
20 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
426 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acute effects of a single, oral dose of d9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) administration in healthy volunteers.
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2012
DOI 10.2174/138161212802884780
Pubmed ID
Authors

R Martin-Santos, J A Crippa, A Batalla, S Bhattacharyya, Z Atakan, S Borgwardt, P Allen, M Seal, K Langohr, M Farré, A W Zuardi, P K McGuire

Abstract

Animal and humans studies suggest that the two main constituents of cannabis sativa, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD) have quite different acute effects. However, to date the two compounds have largely been studied separately.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 426 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 420 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 76 18%
Student > Master 54 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 53 12%
Researcher 46 11%
Other 27 6%
Other 62 15%
Unknown 108 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 16%
Neuroscience 45 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 40 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 8%
Psychology 33 8%
Other 77 18%
Unknown 126 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2023.
All research outputs
#835,697
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#39
of 3,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,614
of 251,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#4
of 215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,972 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.