You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Validity and reliability of wearable inertial sensors in healthy adult walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-020-00685-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dylan Kobsar, Jesse M. Charlton, Calvin T.F. Tse, Jean-Francois Esculier, Angelo Graffos, Natasha M. Krowchuk, Daniel Thatcher, Michael A. Hunt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 18% |
| Australia | 2 | 18% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 2 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 414 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 55 | 13% |
| Researcher | 39 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 152 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 70 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 37 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 13% |
| Unknown | 181 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,703,375
of 23,714,250 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#275
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,140
of 387,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#9
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,714,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.