↓ Skip to main content

Ideas for how informaticians can get involved with COVID-19 research

Overview of attention for article published in BioData Mining, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 253)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 tweeters
Title
Ideas for how informaticians can get involved with COVID-19 research
Published in
BioData Mining, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13040-020-00213-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason H. Moore, Ian Barnett, Mary Regina Boland, Yong Chen, George Demiris, Graciela Gonzalez-Hernandez, Daniel S. Herman, Blanca E. Himes, Rebecca A. Hubbard, Dokyoon Kim, Jeffrey S. Morris, Danielle L. Mowery, Marylyn D. Ritchie, Li Shen, Ryan Urbanowicz, John H. Holmes

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#665,471
of 15,948,653 outputs
Outputs from BioData Mining
#11
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,185
of 283,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioData Mining
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,948,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them