You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hydrothermal stability of cobalt silica membranes in a water gas shift membrane reactor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Separation & Purification Technology, April 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.12.020 |
| Authors |
Scott Battersby, Simon Smart, Bradley Ladewig, Shaomin Liu, Mikel C. Duke, Victor Rudolph, João C. Diniz da Costa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 22% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemical Engineering | 11 | 24% |
| Engineering | 9 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,452,627
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Separation & Purification Technology
#152
of 2,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,000
of 107,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Separation & Purification Technology
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,057 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.