↓ Skip to main content

Institutional Bargaining for Democratic Theorists (or How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Haggling)

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Political Science, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Institutional Bargaining for Democratic Theorists (or How We Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Haggling)
Published in
Annual Review of Political Science, May 2020
DOI 10.1146/annurev-polisci-060118-102113
Authors

Jack Knight, Melissa Schwartzberg

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2020.
All research outputs
#4,488,650
of 15,364,275 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Political Science
#268
of 392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,239
of 275,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Political Science
#22
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,364,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.