You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diverse maize hybrids are structurally inefficient at resisting wind induced bending forces that cause stalk lodging
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-020-00608-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christopher J. Stubbs, Kate Seegmiller, Christopher McMahan, Rajandeep S. Sekhon, Daniel J. Robertson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 31% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
| Engineering | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#6,272,263
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#374
of 1,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,347
of 386,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,096 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.