| Title |
Mathematical models as public troubles in COVID-19 infection control: following the numbers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Sociology Review, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/14461242.2020.1764376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Rhodes, Kari Lancaster |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 12 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 32 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 55% |
| Scientists | 23 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Professor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 24% |
| Unknown | 34 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 29 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 41 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2022.
All research outputs
#862,199
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Health Sociology Review
#14
of 300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,903
of 422,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Sociology Review
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them