RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @CatherineCounts: Just because a new gadget exists doesn’t mean you should use it. Inducing variation often has unintended consequences.…
RT @SafeAirway: An in-situ simulation crossover study looking at the novel aerosol box designed to protect airway practitioners from risk o…
@SpontVentGA @drdavidbrewster @precordialthump @SafeAirway Oh 👀... https://t.co/QB1nyRN94b Independant research validating point of view.... phew. Well done to the authors getting this out in such a timely manner
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @CatherineCounts: Just because a new gadget exists doesn’t mean you should use it. Inducing variation often has unintended consequences.…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @sgdambrauskas: We should really start thinking outside the box for sudden #covid19 related ICU change of practices #SafetyFirst but f…
RT @SafeAirway: An in-situ simulation crossover study looking at the novel aerosol box designed to protect airway practitioners from risk o…
We should really start thinking outside the box for sudden #covid19 related ICU change of practices #SafetyFirst but for the patient first! #PedsICU
An in-situ simulation crossover study looking at the novel aerosol box designed to protect airway practitioners from risk of Sars-CoV2 transmission - longer time to intubation, - reduced 1st pass success - breaches in PPE Keep it simple for safety. http
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
The aerosol box for intubation in COVID‐19 patients: an in‐situ simulation crossover study https://t.co/bjR5h6B39N
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
Articulo que muestra algunas conclusiones sobre las dificultades de usar un “Aerosol Box”. Después de usarlo, personalmente, no lo recomendaría. @Socanestesia @chileanestesia @AnestesiaUC @ARegionalChile https://t.co/OYeIvixfck
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @bryan_reidy: Really slick study which highlights some of the many concerns I have about aerosol boxes for intubation. It seems they h…
RT @bryan_reidy: Really slick study which highlights some of the many concerns I have about aerosol boxes for intubation. It seems they h…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @bryan_reidy: Really slick study which highlights some of the many concerns I have about aerosol boxes for intubation. It seems they h…
RT @bryan_reidy: Really slick study which highlights some of the many concerns I have about aerosol boxes for intubation. It seems they h…
RT @nickmmark: “No intubations without a box took more than one minute, whereas 14 (58%) intubations with a box took over one minute and 4…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
I'd have thought! Dentists - do you really think those boxes are any good?
Really slick study which highlights some of the many concerns I have about aerosol boxes for intubation. It seems they have been adopted with no supporting evidence and may expose patients to unnecessary risk.
RT @hypoxiapapers: The aerosol box for intubation in COVID-19 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. https://t.co/9ZD7zEPKMB
The aerosol box for intubation in COVID-19 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. https://t.co/9ZD7zEPKMB
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @aprfreitas: Please, lets get rid of these boxes already...? Lets find another use for them, like: portable tables, or amplifiers or...…
Just because a new gadget exists doesn’t mean you should use it. Inducing variation often has unintended consequences. The only thing these boxes should be used for is social distancing in the break room.
Please, lets get rid of these boxes already...? Lets find another use for them, like: portable tables, or amplifiers or... wardrobes... whatever doesn’t involves human lives... right?
No surprises
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
“No intubations without a box took more than one minute, whereas 14 (58%) intubations with a box took over one minute and 4 (17%) took over two minutes (including one failure). Without an aerosol box, all anaesthetists obtained first‐pass success.”
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
Another reminder of why the scientific method is so necessary and so powerful. @UPMCAnesRes @anesthesiahq @DepthAnesthesia
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
Aerosol box: mayor tiempo de intubación, menor éxito al 1er intento y daño al EPP https://t.co/7NvigB7x3D
Derp.
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…
RT @NicholasChrimes: Aerosol boxes: longer times to intubation, lower 1st pass success & damage to PPE. Who'd have thought? New study by…