You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Genomic Landscape of Intrinsic and Acquired Resistance to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors in Patients with Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cancer Discovery, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-19-1390 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Seth A Wander, Ofir Cohen, Xueqian Gong, Gabriela N Johnson, Jorge E Buendia-Buendia, Maxwell R Lloyd, Dewey Kim, Flora Luo, Pingping Mao, Karla Helvie, Kailey J Kowalski, Utthara Nayar, Adrienne G Waks, Stephen H Parsons, Ricardo Martinez, Lacey M Litchfield, Xiang S Ye, Chunping Yu, Valerie M Jansen, John R Stille, Patricia S Smith, Gerard J Oakley, Quincy S Chu, Gerald Batist, Melissa E Hughes, Jill D Kremer, Levi A Garraway, Eric P Winer, Sara M Tolaney, Nancy U Lin, Sean G Buchanan, Nikhil Wagle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 108 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 49 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Italy | 4 | 4% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 33 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 58 | 54% |
| Scientists | 31 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 164 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 13% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 64 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 67 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#717,979
of 25,872,466 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#383
of 4,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,091
of 428,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#8
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,872,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.