↓ Skip to main content

A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/ar3468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachelle Buchbinder, Roy Batterham, Gerald Elsworth, Clermont E Dionne, Emma Irvin, Richard H Osborne

Abstract

While the importance and magnitude of the burden of low back pain upon the individual is well recognized, a systematic understanding of the impact of the condition on individuals is currently hampered by the lack of an organized understanding of what aspects of a person's life are affected and the lack of comprehensive measures for these effects. The aim of the present study was to develop a conceptual and measurement model of the overall burden of low back pain from the individual's perspective using a validity-driven approach.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 77 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 19%
Researcher 13 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Master 10 12%
Other 10 12%
Other 22 26%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 15%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Psychology 8 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 6 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,480,273
of 13,040,510 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#879
of 2,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,738
of 119,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,040,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them