Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Domestic Cats
New England Journal of Medicine, August 2020
Peter J. Halfmann, Masato Hatta, Shiho Chiba, Tadashi Maemura, Shufang Fan, Makoto Takeda, Noriko Kinoshita, Shin-ichiro Hattori, Yuko Sakai-Tagawa, Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Masaki Imai, Yoshihiro Kawaoka
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2,698 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||2313||86%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||121||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||44||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 471 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||50||11%|
|Student > Master||42||9%|
|Student > Bachelor||40||8%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||75||16%|
|Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine||68||14%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||55||12%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||41||9%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||22||5%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4047. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,513,158 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
of 31,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 403,446 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,513,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 31,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,446 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.