You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social and ecological outcomes of conservation interventions in tropical coastal marine ecosystems: a systematic map protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-020-00193-w |
| Authors |
Willa R. Brooks, Morgan E. Rudd, Samantha H. Cheng, Brian R. Silliman, David A. Gill, Gabby N. Ahmadia, Dominic A. Andradi-Brown, Louise Glew, Lisa M. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 113 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 16% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 24 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,806,311
of 24,265,140 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#75
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,966
of 390,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#5
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,265,140 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 390,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.