The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 377 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Global Health Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002604 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heidi Oi-Yee Li, Adrian Bailey, David Huynh, James Chan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 28 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% |
| Canada | 16 | 4% |
| India | 9 | 2% |
| Chile | 5 | 1% |
| Greece | 4 | 1% |
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| South Africa | 4 | 1% |
| Panama | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 40 | 11% |
| Unknown | 245 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 249 | 66% |
| Scientists | 72 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 681 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 681 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 11% |
| Researcher | 66 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 66 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 5% |
| Other | 103 | 15% |
| Unknown | 290 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 72 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 35 | 5% |
| Psychology | 29 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 115 | 17% |
| Unknown | 318 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1624. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2024.
All research outputs
#7,248
of 26,329,759 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Global Health Journal
#6
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#427
of 425,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Global Health Journal
#2
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,329,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.