You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioturbating shrimp alter the structure and diversity of bacterial communities in coastal marine sediments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The ISME Journal, July 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ismej.2010.86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bonnie Laverock, Cindy J Smith, Karen Tait, A Mark Osborn, Steve Widdicombe, Jack A Gilbert |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 27% |
| Researcher | 31 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 58 | 46% |
| Environmental Science | 26 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#14,841,711
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from The ISME Journal
#2,814
of 3,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,487
of 104,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The ISME Journal
#20
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,274 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.