↓ Skip to main content

Early urinary catheter removal after rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BJS Open , May 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Early urinary catheter removal after rectal surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BJS Open , May 2020
DOI 10.1002/bjs5.50288
Pubmed ID
Authors

M Castelo, C Sue-Chue-Lam, T Kishibe, S A Acuna, N N Baxter

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 6 20%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unknown 9 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#20,140,268
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from BJS Open
#788
of 833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,049
of 416,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJS Open
#34
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 833 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.