↓ Skip to main content

COVID-19 in Argentine agriculture: global threats, local contradictions and possible responses

Overview of attention for article published in Agriculture & Human Values, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
COVID-19 in Argentine agriculture: global threats, local contradictions and possible responses
Published in
Agriculture & Human Values, May 2020
DOI 10.1007/s10460-020-10096-8
Authors

Juan Manuel Villulla

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2020.
All research outputs
#9,706,354
of 15,252,059 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture & Human Values
#422
of 535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,377
of 237,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture & Human Values
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,252,059 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.