↓ Skip to main content

Why We (Probably) Must Deliberately Infect

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Law and the Biosciences, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Why We (Probably) Must Deliberately Infect
Published in
Journal of Law and the Biosciences, May 2020
DOI 10.1093/jlb/lsaa024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam J Kolber

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Other 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Psychology 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 8 26%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,005,043
of 23,207,489 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#220
of 358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,746
of 385,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,207,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.