↓ Skip to main content

Cost benefits of forest restoration in a tropical grazing landscape: Thiaki rainforest restoration project

Overview of attention for article published in Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cost benefits of forest restoration in a tropical grazing landscape: Thiaki rainforest restoration project
Published in
Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions, July 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102105
Authors

Penny van Oosterzee, Hongbo Liu, Noel D. Preece

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,969,772
of 15,298,914 outputs
Outputs from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#1,305
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,820
of 252,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Environmental Change Part A: Human & Policy Dimensions
#14
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,298,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.