You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The TDR MOOC training in implementation research: evaluation of feasibility and lessons learned in Rwanda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00607-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cole Hooley, Ana A. Baumann, Vincent Mutabazi, Angela Brown, Dominic Reeds, W. Todd Cade, Lisa de las Fuentes, Enola K. Proctor, Stephen Karengera, Kenneth Schecthman, Charles Goss, Pascal Launois, Victor G. Davila-Roman, Eugene Mutimura |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 56% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 56% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 29% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 18% |
| Psychology | 4 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,237,241
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#252
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,261
of 421,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#11
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.