↓ Skip to main content

Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
497 Mendeley
Title
Personal protective equipment for preventing highly infectious diseases due to exposure to contaminated body fluids in healthcare staff
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, May 2020
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd011621.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jos H Verbeek, Blair Rajamaki, Sharea Ijaz, Riitta Sauni, Elaine Toomey, Bronagh Blackwood, Christina Tikka, Jani H Ruotsalainen, F Selcen Kilinc Balci

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 497 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 497 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 73 15%
Student > Master 72 14%
Researcher 53 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 8%
Other 35 7%
Other 107 22%
Unknown 116 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 160 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 82 16%
Unspecified 23 5%
Social Sciences 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 3%
Other 77 15%
Unknown 125 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 59. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2021.
All research outputs
#426,376
of 17,180,396 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#967
of 11,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,904
of 289,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,180,396 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.