↓ Skip to main content

Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
271 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
Ecological drivers of global gradients in avian dispersal inferred from wing morphology
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2020
DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-16313-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Sheard, Montague H. C. Neate-Clegg, Nico Alioravainen, Samuel E. I. Jones, Claire Vincent, Hannah E. A. MacGregor, Tom P. Bregman, Santiago Claramunt, Joseph A. Tobias

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 271 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 247. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#67,007
of 15,576,177 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#914
of 29,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,620
of 283,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,576,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 48.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them