↓ Skip to main content

Probability Ellipse for Tropical Cyclone Track Forecasts with Multiple Ensembles

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 481)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Probability Ellipse for Tropical Cyclone Track Forecasts with Multiple Ensembles
Published in
Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, January 2020
DOI 10.2151/jmsj.2020-042
Authors

Yasuhiro KAWABATA, Munehiko YAMAGUCHI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,517,797
of 15,289,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#6
of 481 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,582
of 214,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,289,603 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 481 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them