↓ Skip to main content

Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
145 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19
Published in
British Medical Journal, May 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m1927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A Hopkins, Roberta Lovick, Louisa Polak, Ben Bowers, Tessa Morgan, Michael P Kelly, Stephen Barclay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Other 13 17%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Psychology 3 4%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 18 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 254. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2021.
All research outputs
#79,889
of 17,944,974 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#1,543
of 52,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,727
of 293,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#83
of 706 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,944,974 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 52,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 706 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.