| Title |
Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.m1927 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah A Hopkins, Roberta Lovick, Louisa Polak, Ben Bowers, Tessa Morgan, Michael P Kelly, Stephen Barclay |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 64 | 50% |
| Australia | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 63 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 42 | 33% |
| Scientists | 17 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 22% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 252. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#148,318
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,175
of 64,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,374
of 424,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#105
of 884 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 884 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.