↓ Skip to main content

Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
142 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Reassessing advance care planning in the light of covid-19
Published in
British Medical Journal, May 2020
DOI 10.1136/bmj.m1927
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A Hopkins, Roberta Lovick, Louisa Polak, Ben Bowers, Tessa Morgan, Michael P Kelly, Stephen Barclay

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Other 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 14 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#200,069
of 16,068,244 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#2,996
of 49,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,300
of 289,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#155
of 705 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,068,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49,933 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,182 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 705 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.