↓ Skip to main content

Research ethics in a pandemic: considerations for the use of research infrastructure and resources for public health activities

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Law and the Biosciences, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
Title
Research ethics in a pandemic: considerations for the use of research infrastructure and resources for public health activities
Published in
Journal of Law and the Biosciences, May 2020
DOI 10.1093/jlb/lsaa028
Authors

Megan Doerr, Jennifer K Wagner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,175,919
of 15,550,854 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#66
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,284
of 280,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Law and the Biosciences
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,550,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them