↓ Skip to main content

Prophylactic use of ergot alkaloids in the third stage of labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prophylactic use of ergot alkaloids in the third stage of labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005456.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tippawan Liabsuetrakul, Thanapan Choobun, Krantarat Peeyananjarassri, Q Monir Islam

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the prophylactic use of uterotonic agents in the third stage of labour reduces postpartum blood loss and moderate to severe postpartum haemorrhage. This is one of a series of systematic reviews assessing the effects of prophylactic use of uterotonic drugs - here, prophylactic ergot alkaloids compared with no uterotonic agents, and different regimens of administration of ergot alkaloids.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
France 1 2%
Ireland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 59 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 5 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 53%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 11%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,435
of 14,615,417 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,077
of 11,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,830
of 123,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#69
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,615,417 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,032 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.5. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.