| Title |
Prioritising access to pandemic influenza vaccine: a review of the ethics literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-020-00477-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jane H. Williams, Angus Dawson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 52% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 12% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 25% |
| Unknown | 32 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2021.
All research outputs
#1,058,318
of 24,916,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#71
of 1,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,069
of 391,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,916,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,081 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.