↓ Skip to main content

Lessons learned from comparing spatially explicit models and the Partners in Flight approach to estimate population sizes of boreal birds in Alberta, Canada

Overview of attention for article published in Ornithological Applications, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lessons learned from comparing spatially explicit models and the Partners in Flight approach to estimate population sizes of boreal birds in Alberta, Canada
Published in
Ornithological Applications, May 2020
DOI 10.1093/condor/duaa007
Authors

Péter Sólymos, Judith D Toms, Steven M Matsuoka, Steven G Cumming, Nicole K S Barker, Wayne E Thogmartin, Diana Stralberg, Andrew D Crosby, Francisco V Dénes, Samuel Haché, C Lisa Mahon, Fiona K A Schmiegelow, Erin M Bayne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 30%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 33%
Environmental Science 5 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2020.
All research outputs
#1,594,254
of 25,932,719 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#166
of 2,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,871
of 425,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,932,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,639 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.