| Title |
Amazon wildfires: Scenes from a foreseeable disaster
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Flora, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.flora.2020.151609 |
| Authors |
Paulo Brando, Marcia Macedo, Divino Silvério, Ludmila Rattis, Lucas Paolucci, Ane Alencar, Michael Coe, Cristina Amorim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 21% |
| Brazil | 15 | 17% |
| Germany | 4 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Portugal | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 66% |
| Scientists | 29 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 255 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 16% |
| Researcher | 33 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 9% |
| Engineering | 11 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 33 | 13% |
| Unknown | 94 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#486,912
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Flora
#2
of 581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,296
of 432,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Flora
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 581 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.