↓ Skip to main content

Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Internal Medicine, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 11,653)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
494 Mendeley
Title
Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction–Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure
Published in
Annals of Internal Medicine, August 2020
DOI 10.7326/m20-1495
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren M. Kucirka, Stephen A. Lauer, Oliver Laeyendecker, Denali Boon, Justin Lessler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8,548 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 494 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 494 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 88 18%
Other 62 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 9%
Student > Master 39 8%
Student > Bachelor 39 8%
Other 141 29%
Unknown 83 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 204 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 35 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Engineering 14 3%
Other 71 14%
Unknown 126 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6816. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2020.
All research outputs
#161
of 16,094,294 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Internal Medicine
#5
of 11,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49
of 291,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Internal Medicine
#2
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,094,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.