@TTBikeFit I have an ongoing thread cataloging this evidence. I will add your post to it. https://t.co/K0ETVBgTR7
@mkeulemans @BertMulderCWZ @rorydevries "Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%–60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating “common cold” coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2." https://
RT @lesmfunk: @Fynnderella1 There's lots of research showing pre-existing immunity. https://t.co/K0ETVBgm1z
@Fynnderella1 There's lots of research showing pre-existing immunity. https://t.co/K0ETVBgm1z
RT @JamesTodaroMD: 7/ This finding was confirmed in yet another study published in Cell in June 2020 showing that 40-60% of unexposed indiv…
RT @Silence81113359: Hiç hastalık geçirmemiş kişilerin (kanlarında koronavirüs antikoru yok) , ancak koronavirüsle savaşma potansiyeline sa…
@sjg351 @ActPeoples @2012er @senatorbabet Would you care to post the study instead of Rennick’s comments about a study? Look, I found it & that study quoted by Rennick in no way says vaccines are ineffective. It’s from June 25, 2020🤦🏻♂️. Really mate,
RT @KristinaDawn7: @rich_purtell @RandPaul @jeffreyatucker The fact T-cells were so ignored (they also are in regards to cancer) = a big 🚩…
@rich_purtell @RandPaul @jeffreyatucker The fact T-cells were so ignored (they also are in regards to cancer) = a big 🚩 to anyone with even a basic grasp of immune systems. T-cells = frontline warriors in the immune system's arsenal. https://t.co/6Ue3NnJ
RT @wb29304326: 新型コロナ感染後回復した患者20人に、新型コロナ特異的T細胞が同定された。CD4+T細胞の反応は、スパイク以外に、M、Nタンパク等も標的にしていた。新型コロナ特異的CD4+T細胞が、非感染者の40%~60%に認められ、従来型風邪コロナとのT細胞交…
Risposta delle cellule T CD4+ dopo un'infezione naturale. 21 proteine virali generano una risposta immunitaria CD4+. Il vaccino suscita solo una risposta a 1 proteina: Spike. etc... https://t.co/cw3QKCY8m5. https://t.co/3U9F8dPIzy
@RWMaloneMD And that doesn't even include pre-existing immunity. (There's actually 20 posts in thread) https://t.co/K0ETVBgTR7
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
RT @inkblue01: In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodi…
In the T cell paper by Crotty & Sette, that Hanage is really referring to - 10% of the participants didn't make any antibodies, and the writers continue to support masking and mitigation to prevent community spread. https://t.co/ZuxmKTDJpp
RT @DrJBhattacharya: "Breaking news" on T-cells 1) May '20 https://t.co/9zB97ReqJ1 2) June '20 https://t.co/EWqZE9k1WW 2) Sept '20 https:…
@jonathandbacon @Seaotter369 Lol. I knew we already had some level of protection. Stupid to think we didn't https://t.co/nf3p4wYfGM
@G_Commish @ejustin46 @Nk9992Nk @supertodd1 @amcalber @dgurdasani1 @VirusesImmunity @EricTopol “human N-specific CD4+ T cell responses were not observed in one of the most comprehensive studies of human SARS-CoV-1 T cell responses.” https://t.co/c5QBnefE
@MarkWallaceGlos People still immune to SARS-CoV 17 years after the 2003 outbreak. SARS-CoV2 = approx 80% the same 🦠. https://t.co/qpIZpbwIJp Sept 2020 https://t.co/nPUNVxTpYv https://t.co/FTsr5b0XqM May 2020 40%-60% of unexposed individuals https://
@msabouri @dobssi @digregjf @pieterstreicher @PienaarJm Im not sure i follow.. whose pre-existing immunity could be super low? They found in san diego blood donors, unexposed individuals 40-60% have reactive t cells to sars cov 2, we always had sig pre exi
@MonicaGandhi9 Try to keep up. Here's some of your "mixed data" https://t.co/K0ETVBgTR7
RT @lesmfunk: Natural (pre-existing) Immunity Thread "we detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%–60% of unexposed individuals"…
@CharlotteNC2022 @i_am_joli_anne @24Kirsten @greg_price11 @RepMTG I dont really care. It's all just about truth for me. And here's you a list of studies proving, yes we had cross reactive immunity prior to vaxx. https://t.co/x25v1Yu6Nu
RT @friedberg: amazing paper. 40-60% of population that have NOT had SARS-CoV-2 already have activated T Cells to the virus! likely due to…
2020: https://t.co/YSNbIQdwAC
@AJKayWriter @gorskon Sure, you really don't watch videos. 🙄 You were already shown you citing a press piece on a term you didn't know the meaning of in a field you lacked expertise in, and then you going off into your pseudoskepticism about it. https://
RT @greg_travis: @AlistairHaimes @FatEmperor @Jo_C08 @LaurenceBettle @toadmeister What do they mean here: "Immunopathogenesis in COVID-19…
@DazeJohnby @don2345611 @ABridgen I still have my natural cross reactive immunity, do you? https://t.co/x25v1Yu6Nu
RT @lesmfunk: Natural (pre-existing) Immunity Thread "we detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%–60% of unexposed individuals"…
RT @lesmfunk: Natural (pre-existing) Immunity Thread "we detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%–60% of unexposed individuals"…
@drcole12 The perfidy was so comprehensive even immunology greats like Shane Crotty @ljiresearch were publishing academic cover for the vaccines. If you followed closely though both Sette & Weiskopf we're hedging, they knew but were cowed by something
2/2 https://t.co/iBZAw0QmXz https://t.co/jKYha6dhxU @tatiann69922625 @Maples46014332 @DoorlessCarp @DerSchwubler @Fynnderella1 @ARadlerPohlDr @TeamsforLife @Jikkyleaks Nothing we would have announced, r8? Don't worry and be happy! https://t.co/c8bokU
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
@ifihadastick Appending my collection of relevant studies on pre-existing immunity. 16 studies and counting... https://t.co/K0ETVBgTR7
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
@MutzUk You mean like the lies told to the public that claimed we had no existing immunity w out a vaxx or treatment? https://t.co/x25v1Yu6Nu
@Derevenger1 @tegenhetsysteem @StevenArra Je zegt naar de feiten te kijken. Oké. Wat maak jj op uit bijv de volgende feiten https://t.co/ZmuIHXUuBd https://t.co/pY5Ekk3viY https://t.co/KLdHswIEqN https://t.co/mh1vUYYXnZ https://t.co/rtPKyHYgHA htt
@1wsky @munchy360 @DrEliDavid * novel virus strains In fact, though. Some people had been exposed to different coronavirus strains and had different levels of natural immunity. Studies were done. https://t.co/ns4gyO4qFg https://t.co/WTVscwA5Rt
@chrisc334 @JordanSchachtel It was a coronavirus. Who didnt already have some level of natural immunity? https://t.co/x25v1YLHF2
⚠️ you may look at the study yourself: https://t.co/Oq0kjgY1D4
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
RT @momotchiii: Ce résultat est confirmé dans ENCORE une autre étude juin2020: 40-60% des individus non exposés ont eu leurs cellules T rec…
@my2pups2 @prima__facie I might would, but I know about all this in this thread. And I didn't know anyone who was actually sick till after vaxx distribution began. And I asked around. Asked everyone I could. We all had the same observations https://t.co/x
RT @Silence81113359: @EricTopol @NatRevImmunol @TheDohertyInst @UniMelb Good Morning Charlatan👇 https://t.co/q1m3xjAl98 May2020 https://t.…
@EricTopol @NatRevImmunol @TheDohertyInst @UniMelb Good Morning Charlatan👇 https://t.co/q1m3xjAl98 May2020 https://t.co/ufcQTr0TGv Aug,2021 https://t.co/AUFtEOvh9a May2021 https://t.co/IZuz9hB5fn Aug2021 https://t.co/XVAIYpa4r5 Jan2021 https://t.co/1xOb6D
@JDCBurnhil @xbrfx @zaugurz @WallStreetSilv It's not like it was all that "brand new" lol https://t.co/rmCYUDL07W
@dchomecoming @DELETETRUMP9 Article chock-full of relevant info: https://t.co/0eBP51iANS
@erozore @AnuRiikonen2 @CatcatMariaa @minna_talvitie @HeimoMikko Itseasiassa tuo ei välttämättä pidä paikkaansa. Jo keväällä 2020 tiedettiin,että merkittävällä osalla ihmisiä olisi syntynyt risti-immuniteettia johtuen aiemmista flunssista ja influenssasta.
@BlocksIncoming Yes, which was ridiculously misguided. https://t.co/2SxULdvRaO https://t.co/PTSOZwRdGY
@AllBiteNoBark88 #SARSCoV2 cross-reactive T-cell responses observed in healthy donors recruited btwn 2015-2018 suggest recognition btwn circulating common cold coronaviruses & COVID & indicate pre-existing immunity in human population. #Ashkenazi #
@Beezer2000 @ryangerritsen @WesternU I think you must have missed most of these studies. It's not as if our immune systems had no idea how to clear and eradicate the virus, from the very beginning. Before vaxx or any treatment. https://t.co/x25v1YuED2
Antibodies are no correlate of immunity. T-cells & memory B's should be your objective. Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals (2020) https://t.co/X24e576Seb https://t.co/bXP3HW
Evidence of pre-existing immunity continues to pile up. Fourteen studies (that I'm aware of) and counting.
@Lizmadhatter864 @KateMatsler @Fishyfish666 @TSAC72 @Dennis_somethin @TheDestinyWells @bealbudgeting Oh there's more A lot more https://t.co/x25v1YuED2
@thrasherxy 22 t cell memory to the common cold https://t.co/Dhi5jDiJye
@VintageKidsNL @DannyTheZebra @denise_dewald @yodster99 Us unvaxxed aren't having that problem. Since we didn't limit our or destroy the cross reactive immunity we already had https://t.co/rmCYUDLxXu
@Medical_Nemesis @gunner964 @DrSuneelDhand 2015-2018:"About 50% of the samples had cross-reactive T cells that targeted the coronavirus" https://t.co/W3c5bmWIjI
@nurseforethics https://t.co/MnzFFt00b2 Nice paper on previous infection. Published 14 May 2020.
Targets of TCell Resp to SARSCoV-2 Cov in COVID19 Disease & Unexposed:immunity SARSCoV2 key for COVID19 & vac;Epitope detect CD4+ & CD8+ Tcells in 100% &70% of CP COVID; Tcell focused on spike & M,N,ORFs Tcell reactiv to CoV2 epitopes a
@abigailsaraachi @uwisnew @jaja9888 @nadyAmbyati @VICE_ID Jurnal2 lainnya yg membahas soal peran sel memori dalam membentuk imunitas https://t.co/sqtHVGunVi
RT @Silence81113359: Hiç hastalık geçirmemiş kişilerin (kanlarında koronavirüs antikoru yok) , ancak koronavirüsle savaşma potansiyeline sa…
@WIRED May 2020 :: ‘Importantly, we detected SARS-CoV-2-reactive CD4+ T cells in ∼40%-60% of unexposed individuals, suggesting cross-reactive T cell recognition between circulating "common cold" coronaviruses and SARS-CoV-2.’ https://t.co/6Ue3NnJzxr
@gerdosi @DrJ56013122 One more study to add to my list https://t.co/K0ETVBgTR7
@zhang_yueting @EbonyJHilton_MD Bla bla bla https://t.co/QCdAPp8GsU
RT @Farolita_Lumbre: INMUNIDAD NATURAL Prueba 1: https://t.co/dIimJnnu1y https://t.co/Sn1G3NqtdW
RT @JamesTodaroMD: 7/ This finding was confirmed in yet another study published in Cell in June 2020 showing that 40-60% of unexposed indiv…