You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of violet LED light on in-office bleaching protocols: a randomized controlled clinical trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Oral Science, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1590/1678-7757-2019-0720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matheus KURY, Erica Eiko WADA, Daylana Pacheco da SILVA, Cínthia Pereira Machado TABCHOURY, Marcelo GIANNINI, Vanessa CAVALLI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 112 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 45 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 43% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 48 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2023.
All research outputs
#15,927,910
of 25,654,566 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#180
of 602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,188
of 479,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Oral Science
#10
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,566 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 602 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.