↓ Skip to main content

The tree that hides the forest: cryptic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in the Palaearctic vector Obsoletus/Scoticus Complex (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) at the European level

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The tree that hides the forest: cryptic diversity and phylogenetic relationships in the Palaearctic vector Obsoletus/Scoticus Complex (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) at the European level
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13071-020-04114-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antoine Mignotte, Claire Garros, Laetitia Gardès, Thomas Balenghien, Maxime Duhayon, Ignace Rakotoarivony, Laura Tabourin, Léa Poujol, Bruno Mathieu, Adolfo Ibañez-Justicia, Ahmet Deniz, Aleksandar Cvetkovikj, Bethan V. Purse, David W. Ramilo, Despoina Stougiou, Doreen Werner, Dubravka Pudar, Dušan Petrić, Eva Veronesi, Frans Jacobs, Helge Kampen, Isabel Pereira da Fonseca, Javier Lucientes, Javier Navarro, Josue Martinez de la Puente, Jovana Stefanovska, Kate R. Searle, Khalid Khallaayoune, C. Lorna Culverwell, Magdalena Larska, Maria Bourquia, Maria Goffredo, Marina Bisia, Marion England, Matthew Robin, Michela Quaglia, Miguel Ángel Miranda-Chueca, René Bødker, Rosa Estrada-Peña, Simon Carpenter, Simona Tchakarova, Sofia Boutsini, Ståle Sviland, Stefanie M. Schäfer, Zanda Ozoliņa, Zanda Segliņa, Zati Vatansever, Karine Huber

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 35%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 13%
Environmental Science 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,643,453
of 25,770,491 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#492
of 6,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,506
of 425,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#19
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,770,491 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.